Bavarian-Board.co.uk - BMW Owners Discussion Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General Forums > General Off Topic Forum
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - WARNING! Unmarked Subaru on M23
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Forum LockedWARNING! Unmarked Subaru on M23

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 8>
Author
Message
dutch View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I
Avatar

Joined: 17-December-2005
Location: lakeside Essex
Status: Offline
Points: 438
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-January-2006 at 17:39
[QUOTE=livvy]

The number of fatal accidents on our roads are a fact.
Every fatal accident is recorded & investigated after all.

How many are attributed to speed?



e39,1200 bandit
cooper S, Z3 topazbleu
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-January-2006 at 17:51
Originally posted by dutch dutch wrote:

Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:



The number of fatal accidents on our roads are a fact.
Every fatal accident is recorded & investigated after all.


How many are attributed to speed?




The reports say speed is a factor in about one third.


Edited by livvy
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone.
Back to Top
Rhys View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Coffee addict...

Joined: 02-February-2003
Location: from the Latin locātiō
Status: Offline
Points: 10053
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-January-2006 at 17:57
Livvy, do you have a list of reasons for fatalities on the roads - speed is one third, what are the others?
V reg Rustbucket Merc C220 Cdi estate
J Reg Saab 900i 16v
'63 Ford Anglia 105e deluxe
R reg Honda PC50 moped..

No BMW as yet...
Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-January-2006 at 18:09
Collisions can have more then one factor in their cause.

Excessive speed is the most frequently recorded factor in fatal collisions.

Also about 25% of fatalities result from single vehicle accidents. No other vehicles or pedestrian involvement at all. Just one vehicle going off road or hitting street furnitures for example.

Rhys I do have some details, I'll dig them out.


Edited by livvy
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone.
Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-January-2006 at 18:23
Between 1999-2002

In fatal collisions the following are the top ten main contributory factors.

Excessive speed 28%
Behaviour careless/thoughtless/reckless  21%
Inattention  18%
Lack of judgement of own path  17%
Failed to judge other persons path or speed  16%
Looked but did not see  14%
Impairment - Alcohol   14%
Failed to look   10%
Behaviour - In a hurry   7%
Aggressive driving   6%



The 5 main precipitating factors in excessive speed accidents

Loss of control resulted in 49%
Failed to avoid vehicle or object in the road in 23%
Failed to give way in 6%
Poor turn or manoeuvre in 5%
Sudden braking in 4%



Edited by livvy
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone.
Back to Top
Rhys View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Coffee addict...

Joined: 02-February-2003
Location: from the Latin locātiō
Status: Offline
Points: 10053
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-January-2006 at 18:36
Interesting, thanks.
V reg Rustbucket Merc C220 Cdi estate
J Reg Saab 900i 16v
'63 Ford Anglia 105e deluxe
R reg Honda PC50 moped..

No BMW as yet...
Back to Top
Rhys View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Coffee addict...

Joined: 02-February-2003
Location: from the Latin locātiō
Status: Offline
Points: 10053
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-January-2006 at 18:42
Where would tiredness come? There are always warning of taking breaks etc. There have been cases where I've had to pull off the road to have a break (I always try to plan these in advance when traveling any distance and have a rest every hour or so even if I'm not).
V reg Rustbucket Merc C220 Cdi estate
J Reg Saab 900i 16v
'63 Ford Anglia 105e deluxe
R reg Honda PC50 moped..

No BMW as yet...
Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-January-2006 at 18:58
Originally posted by Rhys Rhys wrote:

Where would tiredness come? There are always warning of taking breaks etc. There have been cases where I've had to pull off the road to have a break (I always try to plan these in advance when traveling any distance and have a rest every hour or so even if I'm not).


There are 54 seperate listed causation factors.

Impairment - Fatigue is one of them.
It does not figure in the top ten causation factors in fatal collisions.
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone.
Back to Top
dutch View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I
Avatar

Joined: 17-December-2005
Location: lakeside Essex
Status: Offline
Points: 438
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-January-2006 at 19:20

Impairment - Fatigue is one of them.
It does not figure in the top ten causation factors in fatal collisions

how is this worked out if the driver is killed when he fell asleep at the wheel.

back to the thread. one third down to speed !

surely marked police cars would deter a majority of the 2 thirds you site that are not speed related?

e39,1200 bandit
cooper S, Z3 topazbleu
Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-January-2006 at 19:25
Originally posted by dutch dutch wrote:

Impairment - Fatigue is one of them.
It does not figure in the top ten causation factors in fatal collisions

how is this worked out if the driver is killed when he fell asleep at the wheel.

back to the thread. one third down to speed !

surely marked police cars would deter a majority of the 2 thirds you site that are not speed related?



Yes they will help, as will unmarked cars for the reasons I outlined earlier.

Impairment - fatigue doesn't figure in the top ten of non fatal collisions either.


Edited by livvy
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone.
Back to Top
spokey View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar
Offensive and obnoxious tub of lard

Joined: 02-March-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1948
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-January-2006 at 19:39
Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:



Yes they will help, as will unmarked cars for the reasons I outlined earlier.



 
Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:


You need the invisible threat to make people moderate their driving because they fear that an unmarked car could be amongst them.


That's what the police want, is it? To threaten us and to inspire fear?

Yes, I can see how that would be a good thing.


Edited by spokey
Ciao,
Spokey

Back to Top
whitey View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I
Avatar

Joined: 15-May-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 450
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-January-2006 at 05:45
Originally posted by TRACKPIG TRACKPIG wrote:

a marked car stops the speeding in the first place. an unmaked car rakes the cash in.

 

 

My initial point exactly.



Edited by whitey
2000 e39 523i with full factory sport kit.
1989 e30 325i Convertible
1999 Golf GTI 1.8T
Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-January-2006 at 06:01
Originally posted by whitey whitey wrote:

Originally posted by TRACKPIG TRACKPIG wrote:

a marked car stops the speeding in the first place. an unmaked car rakes the cash in.

 

 

My initial point exactly.




If you agree that marked Police cars can influence behaviour, equally not having a marked car present can mean compliance with rules is less likely. How does a marked car encourage compliance ?
It's because people are worried about being caught.

If you want to encourage compliance at the times no marked car is visible (& because of limited coverage this is going to be the vast majority of the time) it will have to be by the possibility that an unmarked car is around and will spot any rule breaking.

After all the idea is to encourage compliance all of the time, not just when a marked Police car is around.

Of course if you don't braek the law, marked car OR unmarked car is of no consequence or concern to you.


Edited by livvy
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone.
Back to Top
spokey View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar
Offensive and obnoxious tub of lard

Joined: 02-March-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1948
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-January-2006 at 06:50
Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:



If you want to encourage compliance at the times no marked car is visible (& because of limited coverage this is going to be the vast majority of the time) it will have to be by the possibility that an unmarked car is around and will spot any rule breaking.

After all the idea is to encourage compliance all of the time, not just when a marked Police car is around.

Of course if you don't braek the law, marked car OR unmarked car is of no consequence or concern to you.


Of course, if you want to live in a country where you fear the police and you want to feel threatened by them, you can always move to Britain.
Ciao,
Spokey

Back to Top
spokey View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar
Offensive and obnoxious tub of lard

Joined: 02-March-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1948
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-January-2006 at 06:54
Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:



I hate burglary.

But the fact is a very small proportion of Police resources are put into traffic enforcement compared to crimes like burglaries.


Quote Police spend more than 500 million a year on paperwork - a sum greater than that spent fighting robberies and house burglaries.


Source

I can only imagine the effort going into non-crime-fighting activities will increase as the police become a team of ANPR-database-querying, CCTV-watching desk jockeys.

Edit: has anyone read about the Police Campaign to Really Alienate the Public?


Edited by spokey
Ciao,
Spokey

Back to Top
dutch View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I
Avatar

Joined: 17-December-2005
Location: lakeside Essex
Status: Offline
Points: 438
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-January-2006 at 08:35

one rule for them comes to mine spokey.

Figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act reveal that 303 officers from the Dyfed-Powys, Gwent and North Wales forces received fixed penalties for exceeding statutory speed limits. But only 29 cases - less than one in 10 - resulted in a fine being paid.

In some cases the documentation about what happened to the officers disappeared completely and outcomes in a further eight cases, in the three force areas, are still "pending".

The RAC Foundation last night said the results showed some police forces were over-using the exemption powers and suggested some police officers believed they had "carte blanche" to break the speed limit regardless of whether they were on a 999 call

e39,1200 bandit
cooper S, Z3 topazbleu
Back to Top
whitey View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I
Avatar

Joined: 15-May-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 450
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-January-2006 at 12:16
Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:

Originally posted by whitey whitey wrote:

Originally posted by TRACKPIG TRACKPIG wrote:

a marked car stops the speeding in the first place. an unmaked car rakes the cash in.

 

 

My initial point exactly.




If you agree that marked Police cars can influence behaviour, equally not having a marked car present can mean compliance with rules is less likely. How does a marked car encourage compliance ?
Point 1. It's because people are worried about being caught.


Point 2. After all the idea is to encourage compliance all of the time, not just when a marked Police car is around.

Point 3. Of course if you don't braek the law, marked car OR unmarked car is of no consequence or concern to you.

Point 1. Exactly right. We are worried about being caught but unmarked Impreza's is not playing cricket old boy.

Point 2. get more marked cars out there with the tax payers money and you'll get less speeding and less deaths on your stats. Unmarked cars generate income and DO NOT save lives........end of!

Point 3. Can you honestly say you've NEVER broken the law by speeding? And of course what my tax is used for will always be of consequence to me.

Call me a cynical old git (I'm a 42 Year old Manager for the main Comms supplier in the UK thats been driving for 24 years and covers in excess of 25k a year) but just like the camera argument, this is all about generating income. When they started hiding cameras behind trees, signs etc. my respect for the police plumetted. It was all about revenue. Thats now (thank the lord) had a stop put to it. So should the use of unmarked high performance cars used for speeding offences. It's underhand and the money spent on these cars should be used to raise the profile of the Police by putting them in marked cars.

That's it from me.



Edited by whitey
2000 e39 523i with full factory sport kit.
1989 e30 325i Convertible
1999 Golf GTI 1.8T
Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-January-2006 at 14:18
Originally posted by spokey spokey wrote:

Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:



I hate burglary.

But the fact is a very small proportion of Police resources are put into traffic enforcement compared to crimes like burglaries.


Quote Police spend more than 500 million a year on paperwork - a sum greater than that spent fighting robberies and house burglaries.


Source

I can only imagine the effort going into non-crime-fighting activities will increase as the police become a team of ANPR-database-querying, CCTV-watching desk jockeys.

Edit: has anyone read about the Police Campaign to Really Alienate the Public?


What , you think the Police want to to do all that paperwork ?

The amount of paperwork they have to do is because we as a society require it of them. Does the officer on the street want to fill out a stop form for every person they ask where they've been or where are they going ?

I don't think so, but it is a demand placed on them.
It is our request for accountability that generates a lot of their paperwork.

I'm sure Police officers given the chance would rather do much less paperwork.

Still does nothing to show that the Police actually put comparably very little rseources into traffic enforcement than other matters.

If you want a cut down on Poice paperwork so that they can be on the streets more, then I'm with you totally.


Edited by livvy
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone.
Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-January-2006 at 15:02
Originally posted by dutch dutch wrote:

one rule for them comes to mine spokey.

Figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act reveal that 303 officers from the Dyfed-Powys, Gwent and North Wales forces received fixed penalties for exceeding statutory speed limits. But only 29 cases - less than one in 10 - resulted in a fine being paid.

In some cases the documentation about what happened to the officers disappeared completely and outcomes in a further eight cases, in the three force areas, are still "pending".

The RAC Foundation last night said the results showed some police forces were over-using the exemption powers and suggested some police officers believed they had "carte blanche" to break the speed limit regardless of whether they were on a 999 call



How do you come to these conclusions ?

Everytime a Police car goes through a camera the officer driving gets a NIP. That's 303 NIPs that were sent out.

Now if they can claim a lawful exemption then the case is dropped. If they can't they get prosecuted. In 29 cases there was no lawful exemption so they were prosecuted. In the rest there was a lawful exemption.

What is wrong with that & what is the point to make from it ?


Edited by livvy
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone.
Back to Top
spokey View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar
Offensive and obnoxious tub of lard

Joined: 02-March-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1948
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-January-2006 at 15:37
Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:

Originally posted by dutch dutch wrote:

one rule for them comes to mine spokey.

Figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act reveal that 303 officers from the Dyfed-Powys, Gwent and North Wales forces received fixed penalties for exceeding statutory speed limits. But only 29 cases - less than one in 10 - resulted in a fine being paid.

In some cases the documentation about what happened to the officers disappeared completely and outcomes in a further eight cases, in the three force areas, are still "pending".

The RAC Foundation last night said the results showed some police forces were over-using the exemption powers and suggested some police officers believed they had "carte blanche" to break the speed limit regardless of whether they were on a 999 call



How do you come to these conclusions ?


He didn't, the RAC Foundation did.

Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:

Everytime a Police car goes through a camera the officer driving gets a NIP. That's 303 NIPs that were sent out.

Now if they can claim a lawful exemption then the case is dropped. If they can't they get prosecuted. In 29 cases there was no lawful exemption so they were prosecuted. In the rest there was a lawful exemption.

What is wrong with that & what is the point to make from it ?


Quote In some cases the documentation about what happened to the officers disappeared completely and outcomes in a further eight cases, in the three force areas, are still "pending".

This makes us FEAR that the police are not bound by the same rules as us. This THREATENS our faith in the police.


Edited by spokey
Ciao,
Spokey

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 8>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.