Bavarian-Board.co.uk - BMW Owners Discussion Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Technical & Model Specific Forums > BMW ///M Power
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - off centre top mounts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Forum Lockedoff centre top mounts

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message
Dannyboy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I
Avatar

Joined: 24-August-2005
Location: Hunstanton
Status: Offline
Points: 301
Direct Link To This Post Topic: off centre top mounts
    Posted: 04-February-2006 at 14:41
How do these work? do you need different mounts depending on how
much you have lowered the car by?
1992 clio 1.8 16V Good
1998 Subaru Impreza Turbo Terzo Great
1987 M3 Diamond Black Awesome (Now awesomer with Billys & Eibach)
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
215DMX View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 14-May-2003
Location: Croydon
Status: Offline
Points: 1780
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-February-2006 at 15:47
Technically they are called 'crash mounts'. Basically
they give you 0.5 degree extra negative camber. It
helps turn in, but you don't get something for
nothing.... as you will get noticably increased wear
on the inside edges of your tyres.

It makes no difference wether you have a lowered
car or not if you want to use them.

The more specialised top mounts will allow for
adjustability in camber and caster and are normally
made without use of rubbber.
Back to Top
Dannyboy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I
Avatar

Joined: 24-August-2005
Location: Hunstanton
Status: Offline
Points: 301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-February-2006 at 16:01
Why do C3 list them as being used to correct the negative camber created
by lowering the car? am I mis understanding what they mean by this? I
think they mean that when you lower the car it adds negative camber and
fitting off centre top mounts removes the negative camber that you have
added by lowering the car.
1992 clio 1.8 16V Good
1998 Subaru Impreza Turbo Terzo Great
1987 M3 Diamond Black Awesome (Now awesomer with Billys & Eibach)
Back to Top
ultegra View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I
Avatar
I Hate Sunday Lunch

Joined: 18-November-2003
Location: Itinerant Pikey
Status: Offline
Points: 319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-February-2006 at 06:41

You are right. If what you want is the perpendicular angle of the tyre restored. Take a look at an e36 m3 evo or an M Coupe: they have offset topmounts, but the strut bearing is offset OUTWARDS [The 3.0 had concentric topmounts].

For all you e36 types, these are the topmounts that are often used swapped L to R to get the negative camber that you want on trackdays etc. If you look carefully you can see the L for left stamp on the reinforcement plate in the topmount.

 



Edited by ultegra
Chris Enright
M Coupe Silver
ex M Coupe Black
ex 318is Silver
318is White
ex M3 GT
ex 318is Red
ex 318is Blue
316i shell - watch this space...
Back to Top
Matt T View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I


Joined: 16-January-2006
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 399
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-February-2006 at 08:00
Originally posted by Dannyboy Dannyboy wrote:

Why do C3 list them as being used to correct the negative camber created
by lowering the car? am I mis understanding what they mean by this? I
think they mean that when you lower the car it adds negative camber and
fitting off centre top mounts removes the negative camber that you have
added by lowering the car.

Thats correct
Back to Top
215DMX View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 14-May-2003
Location: Croydon
Status: Offline
Points: 1780
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-February-2006 at 10:43
I really cannot see why you would want to add
positive camber to a M3, it is biased towards roll
induced understeer as it is. Alpina even used these
on most of their suspension systems for the e30 to
increase negative camber for a better handling car...

Back to Top
Dannyboy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I
Avatar

Joined: 24-August-2005
Location: Hunstanton
Status: Offline
Points: 301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-February-2006 at 12:25
I do not want to make my car hove positive camber I want to restore the
factory camber settings after lowering it.
1992 clio 1.8 16V Good
1998 Subaru Impreza Turbo Terzo Great
1987 M3 Diamond Black Awesome (Now awesomer with Billys & Eibach)
Back to Top
215DMX View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 14-May-2003
Location: Croydon
Status: Offline
Points: 1780
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-February-2006 at 14:39
Originally posted by Dannyboy Dannyboy wrote:

I do not want to make my car
hove positive camber I want to restore the
factory camber settings after lowering it.


I presume you want a better handling car, thats why
you are lowering it in the first place, so why not make
it even better with increased camber?
It will make a difference.

Edited by 215DMX
Back to Top
Dannyboy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I
Avatar

Joined: 24-August-2005
Location: Hunstanton
Status: Offline
Points: 301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-February-2006 at 14:49
because i drive mainly on the road and more camber isn't necessarily
better plus it wares the tyres out quicker.
1992 clio 1.8 16V Good
1998 Subaru Impreza Turbo Terzo Great
1987 M3 Diamond Black Awesome (Now awesomer with Billys & Eibach)
Back to Top
215DMX View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 14-May-2003
Location: Croydon
Status: Offline
Points: 1780
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-February-2006 at 15:08
OK.

As a point of interest these neg. camber mounts are
also listed as a GroupN part and also i believe they
came as standard equipment on the EVO2.

And this is the sort of negative camber you want on
track days...



Over to you Uwe............. hint hint nudge nudge
Back to Top
mysteron35 View Drop Down
Senior Member II
Senior Member II
Avatar
Kings Lynn

Joined: 09-March-2004
Location: Kings Lynn
Status: Offline
Points: 152
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-February-2006 at 16:19

Hi Dannyboy , I have had these on all my M3's and love them ! my Black car is fairly low and has these top mounts fitted , I use my car every day and covered well over 10k miles last year with no wearing of the outside edge .

As you know I'm very local to you so your welcome to drive my car and see what you think .

Regards, Steve . 

92 Carrera RS
95 3.0 M3
ex 5 x e30 m3'3
ex e35 M5
Back to Top
M3Booboo View Drop Down
Senior Member I
Senior Member I


Joined: 25-July-2005
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 120
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-February-2006 at 14:06

Hi Dan,

I just went for a set of these when I renewed everything and I must say handling feels much better with negative camber...only setback is the tyre wear.

Ed.

Owned original Sport Evo when new...couldn't resist buying another one 15 years later!
Back to Top
Dannyboy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I
Avatar

Joined: 24-August-2005
Location: Hunstanton
Status: Offline
Points: 301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-February-2006 at 16:15
My car has been lowered by 30mm therefore increasing the amout of
neagative camber all round. I would like to reduce the amount of
negative came so that it is closer to the factory settings. My original
question which perhaps was poorly explained is. C3 list offset top
mounts as being able to restore factory camber settings after lowering,
are they a one size fits all solution or do you need different mounts depen
ding on how much you have lowered your car.
1992 clio 1.8 16V Good
1998 Subaru Impreza Turbo Terzo Great
1987 M3 Diamond Black Awesome (Now awesomer with Billys & Eibach)
Back to Top
215DMX View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 14-May-2003
Location: Croydon
Status: Offline
Points: 1780
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-February-2006 at 16:55
There is only one option they don't come as left or
right, you can fit to give plus or minus 30 minutes,
wether that will be enough or even too much for how
much (I have a feeling it might be slighty too much.)
you lowered the car, only a laser check before AND
after would tell.

As a guide (if my memory serve me correct !)
factory is between 1*12'   -   0*12'

Edited by 215DMX
Back to Top
UweM3 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 11-February-2003
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 5445
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-February-2006 at 18:07
Originally posted by 215DMX 215DMX wrote:

OK.

As a point of interest these neg. camber mounts are
also listed as a GroupN part and also i believe they
came as standard equipment on the EVO2.

And this is the sort of negative camber you want on
track days...



Over to you Uwe............. hint hint nudge nudge



I know, I know, guilty

Just to explain the picture. It shows a quick adjustable mount for trackday / road use.
When driving TO the track, it remains in the stock centre position. Once arrived you lift your car, open the three nuts and move the top mount to negative (read FUN!!). Before you drive home, lift the car again and set back to centre. Takes 5 mins each side.

This avoids tyre wear in daily use of the car. The negative setting is anyway not THAT dramatical in daily driving if you ask me.


(...and yes I have promised to manufacture a few and I will do my best to get that sorted before the track day season is fully on. Please have mercy, have got some other important things to do right now)
BTW is there any interest in such a conversion?
(will be less money than the Grp N's)

Edited by UweM3
E61 520d, slow and buzzy but my wallet likes the mpg.....
Back to Top
jpboost View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I


Joined: 24-June-2005
Location: London, GB
Status: Offline
Points: 292
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-February-2006 at 03:54

Uwe,

I'd potentially be interested, but it would depend on cost

Can you Pm me a ballpark figure (or give a rough price of the Grp N's are?)

Cheers

John

Back to Top
SHEPSM3 View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar
UK Sport Evolution.

Joined: 26-December-2004
Location: Bristol, UK.
Status: Offline
Points: 1934
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-February-2006 at 05:25

Originally posted by 215DMX 215DMX wrote:

OK.

As a point of interest these neg. camber mounts are
also listed as a GroupN part and also i believe they
came as standard equipment on the EVO2.

Were they really standard on the EVO2? Looks pretty much like any other E30 M3 on mine??? 

[IMG]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y135/ShepsM3/New-1a1.jpg">[IMG]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y135/ShepsM3/New-1b1.jpg">
Back to Top
Jake View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 19-February-2005
Location: East Anglia
Status: Offline
Points: 82
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-February-2006 at 07:53

Hi Danny,

Before assuming your camber is out of the factory range, have it measured.  You may find it is still within.  However, I'm assuming handling is not the reason you lowered your M.

If tyre wear is your only concern install the crash mounts to reduce neg camber and be done with it.  It is a fact that you will enjoy less tyre wear.  Sadly the handling will not be improved one bit (actually reduced).

 

Hope this helps,

Jake

Back to Top
Jake View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 19-February-2005
Location: East Anglia
Status: Offline
Points: 82
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-February-2006 at 07:57

P.S.  Crash mounts were not standard on any E30.

Cheers,

Jake

Back to Top
Dannyboy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I
Avatar

Joined: 24-August-2005
Location: Hunstanton
Status: Offline
Points: 301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-February-2006 at 10:59
Just to be clear My m3 was lowered when i got it I am not now nor have I
ever been into lowering cars, huge stereos, neon lights or any of that
nonsense. I have bought all of my cars on the way the drive, the sound of
the engine and the contact points. I am an enthusiast petrol runs in my
veins not alcho pops. Personally I am of the opinion that if BMw spent
lots of money optimising the suspension for road then why mess around
with it. I think after this thread I am going to return it to factory ride
height with maybe some poly bushes as they last longer.
1992 clio 1.8 16V Good
1998 Subaru Impreza Turbo Terzo Great
1987 M3 Diamond Black Awesome (Now awesomer with Billys & Eibach)
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.113 seconds.