Bavarian-Board.co.uk - BMW Owners Discussion Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General Forums > General Off Topic Forum
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - It’s all about safety!
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Forum LockedIt’s all about safety!

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 9>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Peter Fenwick View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 27-August-2003
Location: Lost somewhere in time...
Status: Offline
Points: 6484
Direct Link To This Post Topic: It’s all about safety!
    Posted: 10-January-2006 at 06:04
Originally posted by thepits thepits wrote:

Originally posted by Peter Fenwick Peter Fenwick wrote:

Originally posted by thepits thepits wrote:

And what's wrong with Status Quo?!  
Not my thing.......

I prefer my rock a bit heavier halm.gif

AHA! such as........ http://www.acdcrocks.com/ 

or  http://www.deep-purple.com/

or did you mean  http://www.thedarknessrock.com/home.html 

None of the above. In fact I can't stand the darkness.

I was thinking of Machinehead, Monster Magnet, Overkill, Korn, Ozzy to name but a few.

Entering an age of Austerity and now driving a Focus Diesel.
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
spokey View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar
Offensive and obnoxious tub of lard

Joined: 02-March-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1948
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-January-2006 at 19:13
Generation Speedkill?
Ciao,
Spokey

Back to Top
Rhys View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Coffee addict...

Joined: 02-February-2003
Location: from the Latin locātiō
Status: Offline
Points: 10053
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-January-2006 at 19:11
Back on topic please.

(..no mention of Slayer, Obituary etc..? )
V reg Rustbucket Merc C220 Cdi estate
J Reg Saab 900i 16v
'63 Ford Anglia 105e deluxe
R reg Honda PC50 moped..

No BMW as yet...
Back to Top
thepits View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 09-July-2003
Location: far far away
Status: Offline
Points: 10000473
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-January-2006 at 17:50
Originally posted by Peter Fenwick Peter Fenwick wrote:

Originally posted by thepits thepits wrote:

And what's wrong with Status Quo?!  
Not my thing.......

I prefer my rock a bit heavier halm.gif

AHA! such as........ http://www.acdcrocks.com/ 

or  http://www.deep-purple.com/

or did you mean  http://www.thedarknessrock.com/home.html 

Cats know your every thought.

But don't care.
Back to Top
Peter Fenwick View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 27-August-2003
Location: Lost somewhere in time...
Status: Offline
Points: 6484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-January-2006 at 12:56
Originally posted by thepits thepits wrote:

And what's wrong with Status Quo?!  

Not my thing.......

I prefer my rock a bit heavier halm.gif

Entering an age of Austerity and now driving a Focus Diesel.
Back to Top
thepits View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 09-July-2003
Location: far far away
Status: Offline
Points: 10000473
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-January-2006 at 18:31

Originally posted by Peter Fenwick Peter Fenwick wrote:

Originally posted by thepits thepits wrote:

  
Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:

Originally posted by spokey spokey wrote:

But I'm not going to keep quiet when someone defends the status quo...
Who's defending the status quo....
Whats the matter with Status Quo - why do they need defending?  http://www.statusquo.co.uk/

(sorry! just trying to inject a bit of humour into the thread.)

Status quo............oh my god!!  

And what's wrong with Status Quo?!  

I was lucky enough to see them play in their tour just before that cancelled the rest - 2 & 1/2 hours with a 10 min break! Not bad for old men!  

Cats know your every thought.

But don't care.
Back to Top
Peter Fenwick View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 27-August-2003
Location: Lost somewhere in time...
Status: Offline
Points: 6484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-January-2006 at 13:22
Originally posted by thepits thepits wrote:

 

Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:

Originally posted by spokey spokey wrote:

But I'm not going to keep quiet when someone defends the status quo...


Who's defending the status quo....

whats the matter with Status Quo - why do they need defending?

http://www.statusquo.co.uk/

 

 

(sorry! just trying to inject a bit of humour into the thread.)

Status quo............oh my god!!

Entering an age of Austerity and now driving a Focus Diesel.
Back to Top
thepits View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 09-July-2003
Location: far far away
Status: Offline
Points: 10000473
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-January-2006 at 12:16

 

Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:

Originally posted by spokey spokey wrote:

But I'm not going to keep quiet when someone defends the status quo...


Who's defending the status quo....

whats the matter with Status Quo - why do they need defending?

http://www.statusquo.co.uk/

 

 

(sorry! just trying to inject a bit of humour into the thread.)

Cats know your every thought.

But don't care.
Back to Top
spokey View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar
Offensive and obnoxious tub of lard

Joined: 02-March-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1948
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-January-2006 at 11:58
Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:

Originally posted by spokey spokey wrote:

But I'm not going to keep quiet when someone defends the status quo for the uncaring masses while moaning at enthusiast drivers for not making more effort to do things.


Who's defending the status quo. I'm for action. But it has to be realistic with achieveable goals towards minimising/reducing death & injury on our roads.


Which is basically to slow everyone down (not just with speed limits), rather than spend any money making the roads better or providing a viable alternative.

The kind of action you are promoting is more scameras, more fascist bungling, more restriction of the individual, moaning at people to join the IAM and absolving the government for any of the blame.

Sadly, I suppose that is realistic. Certainly very apt for NeuLabour.
Ciao,
Spokey

Back to Top
sleeper View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar
Original and STILL best

Joined: 26-March-2004
Location: East Sussex/Kent border
Status: Offline
Points: 2098
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-January-2006 at 04:20

Looking at the complete lack of maintenance to - and investment in - our road network, in a few years time this whole discussion based on using the roads and standards on them will be irrelevant - they will be un-usable by anyone who doesn't have an SUV.

Can anyone remember seeing a road being 'properly' re-laid (like you used you see *under maggie * )?

I haven't seen anything other than M and dualled A roads having any serious work done for easily 10 years. Yes there are by-passes for villages where councillors live but what good are these if they aren't fed by the existing roads?

Where is all this money going? - third world and pay rises for MP's no doubt

Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-January-2006 at 01:34
Originally posted by spokey spokey wrote:


Anyway. It's just 225 people, for which we carry this crushing load of invasive regulation and spying.

Meanwhile, 20 000 die needlessly due to government incompetence IN HOSPITALS. Why aren't they making so much effort on that front?


It's not just 225 people , it's not just deaths from speeding or tackling just speeding & with ANPR etc it's not just traffic offences.

Yes, I know about the problems in hospitals, I know about the waste in hospitals, I know that the amount of training etc (& they are given a lot with constant reminders everywhere on the wards I have experience of) that is given & focused on contamination leading to MRSA etc. It's a totally different discussion. The pressure that doctors & nurses are under due to numbers leads to complacency & corner cutting in hygiene there, so let's help them out by keeping people from going to hospital in the first place through unnecessary collisions & that will free resources to also help with that fight.


Edited by livvy
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone.
Back to Top
Rhys View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Coffee addict...

Joined: 02-February-2003
Location: from the Latin locātiō
Status: Offline
Points: 10053
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-January-2006 at 19:59
Originally posted by spokey spokey wrote:


Meanwhile, 20 000 die needlessly due to government incompetence IN
HOSPITALS. Why aren't they making so much effort on that front?


..the do.. they close wards because the hospitols can't afford to keep them open. Closed wards mean less people to care for which = less deaths in hospitols. The statistics go down, but they don't tell you why.

Some hospitols build new wings, then close them - but still heat them. One hospitol built a new gynocology wing - the carpet that was deliverd wasn't liked by one of the top brass that visited that day so they skipped it as it couldn't be returned (tens of thousands of pounds worth). There are too many cheifs and not enough indians - but that is a different topic alltogether. (I know someone that worked on the wing of the hospitol in question before you ask,that was there)
V reg Rustbucket Merc C220 Cdi estate
J Reg Saab 900i 16v
'63 Ford Anglia 105e deluxe
R reg Honda PC50 moped..

No BMW as yet...
Back to Top
spokey View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar
Offensive and obnoxious tub of lard

Joined: 02-March-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1948
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-January-2006 at 19:49
Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:


But there are cheaper cost effective measures that can still be aimed at reducing deaths on the roads. Encouraging people to further their skills with inexpensive driving organisations is one.


Livvy, that is utter, utter horsepucky.

The government is crushing us underfoot with a morass of regulation and fascist spying, and you want me to accommodate them by just accepting that AND doing for myself what they should be doing for everyone?

Anyway. It's just 225 people, for which we carry this crushing load of invasive regulation and spying.

Meanwhile, 20 000 die needlessly due to government incompetence IN HOSPITALS. Why aren't they making so much effort on that front?
Ciao,
Spokey

Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-January-2006 at 19:33
Originally posted by spokey spokey wrote:

But I'm not going to keep quiet when someone defends the status quo for the uncaring masses while moaning at enthusiast drivers for not making more effort to do things.


Who's defending the status quo. I'm for action. But it has to be realistic with achieveable goals towards minimising/reducing death & injury on our roads.

Originally posted by spokey spokey wrote:


Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:

I don't have a problem with re-testing. I think the introduction of something on such a scale would be a massive undertaking & the feasability needs careful consideration. The money it would cost may be more productive in other areas.


Yeah, like hospitals.

How much is your life worth? Or your daughter or son or partner or mom or dad or whoever?



Yes perhaps.
Compulsory retesting would I think cost a hell of a lot to get off the ground & that money may be more productive in hospitals.

But there are cheaper cost effective measures that can still be aimed at reducing deaths on the roads. Encouraging people to further their skills with inexpensive driving organisations is one.
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone.
Back to Top
spokey View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar
Offensive and obnoxious tub of lard

Joined: 02-March-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1948
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-January-2006 at 19:25
Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:


Our test is actually rigorous compared to most nations.
Our pass rate is already only about 42% nationally.
Bewteen 1200 & 1500 new drivers licences are revoked every month because they have reached 6 penalty points within their first 2 years of driving.


But livvy, it's all about the lives you can save! And all you have to do is stop striking a balance, and take decisive action.

Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:


What have you done personally about getting yourself tested or skidpan control ?


If it's any of your business, I get my ears boxed by a class 1 traffic policeman once a year (it's too humiliating doing it more often than that) and I make an effort to do at least one skidpan course per annum. I also do track days in as many of my cars as I can afford to make sure I know how each behaves on the limit.

But, on my own, I am not the problem. I am part of a huge community of drivers, 99.9% of whom see driving as an unpleasant chore to be endured with as little effort as possible. None of them do anything about their driving. If I saw more evidence of drivers making as much effort as I do, I'd shut up. But I'm not going to keep quiet when someone defends the status quo for the uncaring masses while moaning at enthusiast drivers for not making more effort to do things.

Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:

I don't have a problem with re-testing. I think the introduction of something on such a scale would be a massive undertaking & the feasability needs careful consideration. The money it would cost may be more productive in other areas.


Yeah, like hospitals.

How much is your life worth? Or your daughter or son or partner or mom or dad or whoever?

Ciao,
Spokey

Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-January-2006 at 19:18
Originally posted by spokey spokey wrote:

Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:

The majority of drivers out there couldn't pass their DSA test if they were forced to sit it tomorrow. The effects of losing millions of drivers overnight wwould be catastophic to business & the economy.


But think of the lives you would save, livvy!

(I can't believe this is the same person who berated us for not wanting to sign up immediately to that hugely pro-driver organisation, the IAM and do our advanced driving tests!)


I've said all along that it is a question of balance. We will have some deaths on our roads that is inevitable. But not enforcing speed limits or other motoring offences is no way to go about minimising & reducing them.

It's not about getting drivers off the roads by banning them. It's about changing poor driver behaviour & a whole raft of proposals and improvements aimed towards safer motoring for all.


Edited by livvy
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone.
Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-January-2006 at 19:13
Originally posted by spokey spokey wrote:


How about: "make the driving test more rigorous"?
How about: "make the driving test a bi-annual event"?
How about: "make the driving test include things like skid pan car control"?

Unlike you livvy, I'm fully aware that my driving style is not perfect.

Making drivers more lazy and more stupid might mask the symptoms, it does little to address the root cause.


Our test is actually rigorous compared to most nations already.
Our pass rate is only about 42% nationally.
Bewteen 1200 & 1500 new drivers licences are revoked every month, because they have reached 6 penalty points or more within their first 2 years of driving.

What have you done personally about getting yourself tested or skidpan control ?

I don't have a problem with re-testing. I think the introduction of something on such a scale would be a massive undertaking & the feasability needs careful consideration. The money it would cost may be more productive in other areas.


Edited by livvy
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone.
Back to Top
spokey View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar
Offensive and obnoxious tub of lard

Joined: 02-March-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1948
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-January-2006 at 19:08
Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:

The majority of drivers out there couldn't pass their DSA test if they were forced to sit it tomorrow. The effects of losing millions of drivers overnight wwould be catastophic to business & the economy.


But think of the lives you would save, livvy!

(I can't believe this is the same person who berated us for not wanting to sign up immediately to that hugely pro-driver organisation, the IAM and do our advanced driving tests!)


Edited by spokey
Ciao,
Spokey

Back to Top
spokey View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar
Offensive and obnoxious tub of lard

Joined: 02-March-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1948
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-January-2006 at 19:07
Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:

It's not about not wanting people to have the freedom to drive if they wish. A large part of our population need to drive.
It's about wanting them to do it responsibly & within our laws. Within the rules they had to in order to pass their tests.


It's about the government making public transport AND motoring a complete PITA to encourage a larger percentage of dole-scrounging chavs to sit at home watching Trisha and voting for a continuance of the welfare state.
Ciao,
Spokey

Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-January-2006 at 19:02
Originally posted by Rhys Rhys wrote:

OK, here's a question..

If everyone on the road is expected to be able to drive to a safe standard that would make scameras (and livvy ) unnecessary - then why isn't this implemented in the national driving licence say upto some sort of IAM standard?
(I still say it should be compulsary for learners to go through a DL196 course - CBT to the younger ones here)


Legacy issues for one.
The majority of drivers out there couldn't pass their DSA test if they were forced to sit it tomorrow. The effects of losing millions of drivers overnight wwould be catastophic to business & the economy.
The Road safety bill also has plans to improve training & testing arrangements within it.

It's not about not wanting people to have the freedom to drive if they wish. A large part of our population need to drive.
It's about wanting them to do it responsibly & within our laws. Within the rules they had to in order to pass their tests.
People get more confident after their tests, but sadly that doesn't always equate to their driving improving after their test.

I did see an article on the possiblity of power restrictions on motors for new drivers, similar to those for motorcycle passes.


Edited by livvy
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 9>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.178 seconds.