E30 M3 Dyno Plot |
Post Reply | Page <1234 5> |
Author | |||
gary
Really Senior Member II Just Call me Wendy ;-) Joined: 16-October-2002 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 4263 |
Posted: 29-November-2004 at 16:33 | ||
Yeah where abouts in Livingston. The Scottish region are talking of having another dyno run next year.
CLUB We had one at Dastek in Dalgety BAy not that long ago. Colin and mines were pretty similar in both torque and BHP figures. A good day out and all for £20 |
|||
Sponsored Links | |||
stevesingo
Really Senior Member II Joined: 03-January-2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 795 |
Posted: 30-November-2004 at 02:02 | ||
Gary, What exactly were the power/torque figures for you car? I too have a Sport Evo and would be interested to know.
Thanks Steve Edited by stevesingo |
|||
Guests
Guest |
Posted: 11-December-2004 at 06:40 | ||
Well I've had mine on the rollers again this morning. Since the last time I posted towards the start of this thread I've done the following: 1. Replaced Scorpion exhaust with Supersprint system
Edited by _Tim_ |
|||
gary
Really Senior Member II Just Call me Wendy ;-) Joined: 16-October-2002 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 4263 |
Posted: 11-December-2004 at 07:21 | ||
Steve sorry for not getting back to you quicker, been busy. I was producing 250BHP at 7500 revs and 189lb/ft of torque at 6000 revs |
|||
chippeduk
Really Senior Member II ECU Tech Joined: 04-June-2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 696 |
Posted: 11-December-2004 at 07:40 | ||
That map looks wicked. I would say that the look of the curve says the wheels spinned on the rollers at around 2000rpm as apposed to that being a flat spot which is usual. Very nice. |
|||
stevesingo
Really Senior Member II Joined: 03-January-2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 795 |
Posted: 11-December-2004 at 07:46 | ||
That sounds fit and healthy. Is your car standard? Steve |
|||
chippeduk
Really Senior Member II ECU Tech Joined: 04-June-2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 696 |
Posted: 11-December-2004 at 07:49 | ||
what engine was giving the 250hp ? 4pot m3 ? what mods ?
|
|||
PikeyM3
Really Senior Member I E30 M3 Joined: 31-May-2003 Location: Cheltenham - Uk Status: Offline Points: 438 |
Posted: 11-December-2004 at 14:23 | ||
look at garys signatue chippeduk. Tim your torque figure doesn't cross at 5,250rpm Does this prove the previous theory wrong or is there something funny about that dyno chart? Pikey |
|||
Old enough to know better, too young to care!
|
|||
chippeduk
Really Senior Member II ECU Tech Joined: 04-June-2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 696 |
Posted: 11-December-2004 at 14:33 | ||
I only just realised that !!! There has definately been a mistake here, they must cross earlier. |
|||
stevesingo
Really Senior Member II Joined: 03-January-2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 795 |
Posted: 11-December-2004 at 23:40 | ||
If you look carefully the torque scale starts at 55lb/ft and the Power starts at 10bhp.
At about 5252rpm the power is about 170bhp and the torque is just less than 170lb/ft so it is not too far out. Steve Edited by stevesingo |
|||
Guests
Guest |
Posted: 12-December-2004 at 05:43 | ||
There is no mistake, that theory only works when both torque and bhp graphs are on the same scale, which this isn't.
|
|||
PikeyM3
Really Senior Member I E30 M3 Joined: 31-May-2003 Location: Cheltenham - Uk Status: Offline Points: 438 |
Posted: 12-December-2004 at 11:53 | ||
Ah I see! That seems a better way of displaying the torque graph. Seems to be producing the figures a bit higher up in the revs than stated in the standard figures. Wonder why that is? Perhaps the exhaust flows better at higher revs, although your not losing any power lower down the scale. Curve seems nice and smooth. Pikey |
|||
Old enough to know better, too young to care!
|
|||
gary
Really Senior Member II Just Call me Wendy ;-) Joined: 16-October-2002 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 4263 |
Posted: 17-December-2004 at 09:16 | ||
As far as I know the car is standard. It has had a new head and block from BMW in June 2002. I don't know if that would have anything to do with it. I must confess that alot of this goes over my head. I was also running normal unleaded at the time of the R/R session, but was advised to use |Optimax which I have being doing since. |
|||
stevesingo
Really Senior Member II Joined: 03-January-2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 795 |
Posted: 17-December-2004 at 09:41 | ||
My Sport Evo has had a new block and pistons along with a full rebuild less than 6k ago. It will be interesting to see what it puts out. It will be getting at least a re-map maybe even A/N when I get back from this job in April. What was it putting out at the wheels? Steve |
|||
mogart1
Groupie Joined: 01-February-2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 90 |
Posted: 17-December-2004 at 10:42 | ||
Sorry to sound sceptical, but 250 bhp in standard form is surely incorrect? What was the factory quoted output for this model? I thought a couple of threads ago, there was a conclusion that it was only worth quoting rear wheel figures. Anything else just adds confusion. |
|||
M3 S50 Saloon 'Individual'
|
|||
215DMX
Really Senior Member II Joined: 14-May-2003 Location: Croydon Status: Offline Points: 1780 |
Posted: 17-December-2004 at 10:55 | ||
Yeah, i'd say there must be some different cams in
there Gary. 225bhp seems to be the average for a standard sport. |
|||
darylzimm3
Groupie Joined: 21-September-2004 Location: West sussex Status: Offline Points: 42 |
Posted: 17-December-2004 at 11:11 | ||
Have recently had mine re-mapped after engine rebuild and alpha n, have not got a scanner so can not post the dyno, but i was really pleased with the results - 266bhp - 219lb/ft ( at the flywheel ) On the dyno it says ( MPH ) surely this can't be correct as mine reads 219 mph !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ANYBODY ? ( Go on then uwe ) |
|||
gary
Really Senior Member II Just Call me Wendy ;-) Joined: 16-October-2002 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 4263 |
Posted: 17-December-2004 at 11:22 | ||
Colin Gallie was there and has a Sport evo engine in his 2002 and he was putting out about the same. He seemed to think there were different cams in as well.
Although I have'nt put them in and I don't have a reciept to say the prevoius owner did either, it's not beyond the bounds of possibility. Unfortunately I don't have a scanner so can't post a pic of the print out. I think the guesstimate convertion for the BHP at the wheels were about 210 BHP. Which I was quite pleased about as it is standard as far as I know. As I said alot of this goes over my head, but that is what my car dynoed at at Dastek in Dalgety Bay in Fife. I will try and take a photo of the print out and post it up and those in the know can tell me if my engine is healthy or not. |
|||
gary
Really Senior Member II Just Call me Wendy ;-) Joined: 16-October-2002 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 4263 |
Posted: 17-December-2004 at 11:36 | ||
I hope this works.
Here are the pic's of my dyno figures |
|||
DAWIEM3
Really Senior Member I Joined: 17-February-2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 489 |
Posted: 17-December-2004 at 15:10 | ||
Intresting thread, My track car has just been re mapped to sort out a few gremlins and the following was achieved. 269.7 BHP @ 7397 rpm and 202lbft @ 6303rpm. When it was in 2.0l form it made 218.8BHP @ 7945rpm and 158.2lbft @ 6694rpm. This was more than my standard 2.3l road car from a 2.0l S14. Where those 320is boys, as I may sell my 2.0L engine, which I currently have stripped for more goodies to go inside. Both these engines used the same head with schrick 284`s, MBE, CF air box. Still is more room for improvement, and by changing the cams should hopefully see target of 300BHP as the 284`s are what is now restricting the engine. With wilder cams comes the cost of shim under and buckets so will live with it like this for a while. I will try and post the printouts tomorrow once I can scan them. Uwe also has a copy, so he may post printout of the 2.5L if he reads this.
|
|||
E30 M3 Road car ( Now in Hongkong )
E30 M3 Track Car S14 2.0L 2002 in progress E30 C2 2.7 Alpina E36 M3 3.2 EVO |
|||
Post Reply | Page <1234 5> |
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |